Self-Funding vs. Level-Funding: What to Know
Ashley Wong

Exploring Employee Health Benefits: Key Considerations

Finding the right employee health benefits can feel like a daunting task. Employers are constantly seeking cost-effective solutions that balance flexibility, risk tolerance, and cost predictability. Understanding the nuances between self-funded and level-funded health plans can make this decision easier and more informed.

Self-Funded Plans

With a self-funded plan, employers have the flexibility to pay for employee health claims directly as they occur. This setup provides full control over plan design and vendor selection, allowing companies to tailor benefits precisely to their needs.

However, one significant challenge with self-funded plans is the unpredictability of costs. High-cost claims can impact budgets severely, thus introducing the need for stop-loss insurance to protect against unexpected financial burdens.

Regulatory oversight for self-funded plans falls under federal law through ERISA, not state insurance regulations. This distinction means different compliance obligations, which employers need to understand when considering self-funded options.

Level-Funded Plans

Level-funded plans offer a structured approach, combining a fixed monthly payment that covers estimated claims, administrative fees, and stop-loss coverage. This structure provides financial protections similar to traditional insurance.

Employers benefit from managing their expenses against this predictable payment schedule, where claims overages are capped. Additionally, if claims come in lower than projected, companies may receive refunds or credits, contributing to potential savings.

Key Differences

When comparing risk tolerance, self-funded plans place the entire financial risk on the employer, while level-funded plans cap that risk through predetermined payments. This cap makes budgeting more straightforward with level-funded plans.

In terms of savings potential, self-funded plans might offer higher long-term savings if claims remain low. Conversely, level-funded plans may provide partial refunds, ensuring cost effectiveness.

Regarding customization levels, self-funded plans offer maximum control over benefits design. In contrast, level-funded plans balance customization with the support of a third-party provider, simplifying administration.

Recommendations Based on Company Size and Stability

Larger or financially stable companies might find self-funding advantageous due to their ability to absorb cost fluctuations. On the other hand, small to midsize businesses could benefit from the predictable nature of level-funding.

Before deciding between these two models, companies should evaluate their financial stability, risk tolerance, and preferred level of control over the plan design. Both options have distinct advantages over traditional insurance methods, depending on individual business needs.

We recommend businesses consult with an expert to discuss the best health coverage approach for their employees. Such guidance ensures a tailored and effective health benefits strategy.